Thursday, May 21, 2009

Proof that Bridget (as in the essential Bridget) and I (as in the essential me) have severe issues....

And these issues are very much ongoing.....

This conversation is currently taking place on Facebook, on Bridget's Wall. O.o O.o O.o O.o

It started so innocently, with Bridget's new status being:

Bridget thanks God for insanity. Life would be so boring without it.

But then I commented:
Agreed. Plus, you wouldn't exist, right? If there was no insanity? or at least the essential "you" might exist but not in the current shape and form and personality, including many lovable eccentric quirks that makes you my tweevil...*confused and frightens herself and runs away screaming*

It ended there, and for a moment, the world was safe.... but not for long!

We rehashed the issue, you see.

Bridget: You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time. o.o

Me: And you can please me sometimes without pleasing me other times but sometimes you can please me as in me, but not as in me, the essential me, so sometimes you please me but not me, and then other times you please both me and the essential me, and other times, you please the essential me but not me....

Bridget: And you confuse me, both me, the but not really me, and also the essential me, all of the time.

Me: And I am pleased at your confusion, but that is only me, not the essential me. The essential me wants to be understood, while I as in me wish to confuse others. :D

Poor me...

I mean, poor essential me.

Don't think I meant me, please.

It was just a typo.

No, really.

You have to believe me.

Me as in the essential me, not me.

Bridget: The you, as in the non-essential you, always manages to confuse me, and the essential me, but I think the essential me, not the just me, understands the essential you.

Me: That comment had the most unfortunate effect of confusing me, but the essential me understood perfectly, and would like me, as in me, not the essential me, to say that me, as in the essential me, not as in me, understands you, as in the essential you, not as in you, very well, but that you, as in you, not the essential you, often confuses me, as in the essential me, not as in me, very much, but that me as in me, not the essential me, understands you as in you, not the essential you, very well.

Do we, as in the essential us, understand each other? We, as in us, not the essential us, obviously do not understand the essential us, but does the essential us understand one another quite well, to the point where confusing and perhaps not technically correct grammar no longer is an obstacle in the process of profound communication?

Bridget: The me, as in the essential me, not as in the not essential me, understood the you, as in the essential you, perfectly. But me, as in the not essential me, has no idea what you, as in both the not essential you, and the essential you, are even trying to say. Clearly we, as in the essential us, have issues. Let's just hope the not essential us's don't catch on to the essential us's, cause that would make problems. O.o

Me: I, as in the essential me, would have hoped you, as in the non-essential you, would have had some clue as to what I, as in both the non essential me and the essential me, was speaking of.... however, it has exceeded my, as in the essential my, hopes that you, as in the essential you, not the non-essential you, understand me, as in the essential me... Read More, perfectly. I, as in the non-essential me, would have hoped that it would have been us, as in the non essential us, who had problems, as I, as in the essential me, though the non essential me hopes so too, hope and believe that it is us, as in the non essential us, not as in the essential us, who had issues.




....................

And I as in the essential me is waiting on Bridget's, as in the essential Bridget, answer, but I, as in the non-essential me, is currently pondering the deep questions we, as in both the essential us and the non-essential us, we discussing.

In the mean time, don't say more, as in the non-essential more, and don't say more, as in the essential more, either, say Mordor (as in both the essential and non-essential Mordor)!

10 comments:

Dayandnight said...

OK this is very confusing!

Rose said...

Oh my.


And i thought Jo and i were insane...

Turwethiel Merilwen said...

ooh.......my. why is it when I read this, Jack Sparrow comes to mind? :P

The Other Katie said...

^^Or Bilbo?
And these very confusing people are my new cousins? Oh dear....hopefully you aren't as confusing on the FTN forums...
jk! :P

Trina said...

Wow.

Amanda said...

I think i, as in the essential i and not as in the non-essential i, am finally beginning to understand. However, i, as in the non-essential i and not the essential i, has absolutely no idea what that whole post was essentially about.

Adonnenniel said...

lol! I applaud you both for being very philosophical and deep. My head is hurting from trying to fathom what you've wrote. :)

I never knew that there was such a thing as an essential me until I read this post. Well, I suppose that the essential me was aware of its existence, but the non-essential me was unaware of the essence of the essential me. I think. I'm confused. :P

Love,
Addie

Angel_Horses said...

The non-essential me is very happy that most of you are confused, but the essential me is very happy that one or two of you have seemed to slightly grasp the subject of the difference between the essential and non essential us. :)

Nenette said...

Wow. You guys are crazy, no doubt about it!
lol!!!!!!!!!!

Angel_Horses said...

I get that a lot, Netty ;)